then what’s the problem with starting up a gov’t funded alternative?

1.) People argue of dooms day scenarios regarding waiting lists to get teeth pulled, but never take into account all of the people who wait until the last minute to get medical treatment b/c they have no health insurance. THESE PEOPLE WHO WAIT ARE DRIVING UP THE COSTS of healthcare b/c by seeking no preventative care, they increase the amount of expensive surgeries and extended stays at hospitals. As it stands, Americans are already paying for that now.

2.) The people that state that the US can’t afford gov’t funded healthcare due to sky high taxes overlook the fact that healthcare costs are the leading cause of bankruptcy today among people that HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE.

3.) The people that state that if the gov’t provides healthcare, it will eventually have within it’s ability control to manage every aspect of our lives have obviously never heard of the military, CIA, FBI, NSA, Homeland Security, Federal Reserve, Treasury and Coast Guard, which at any point can control every aspect of our lives today.

What’s wrong with a gov’t funded alternative?

Technorati Tags: cia, cia fbi, coast guard, dooms day, extended stays, fbi, federal reserve, health insurance, healthcare costs, homeland security, hospitals, last minute, leading cause of bankruptcy, medical treatment, nsa, preventative care, scenarios, surgeries, treasury, waiting lists

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAGzLfmV4Ks

"The 0 billion bailout for Wall Street, is driven by fear not fact. This is too much money in too a short a time going to too few people while too many questions remain unanswered.

Why aren’t we having hearings on the plan we have just received? Why aren’t we questioning the underlying premise of the need for a bailout with taxpayers’ money? Why have we not considered any alternatives other than to give 0 billion to Wall Street? Why aren’t we asking Wall Street to clean up its own mess? Why aren’t we passing new laws to stop the speculation, which triggered this? Why aren’t we putting up new regulatory structures to protect investors? How do we even value the 0 billion in toxic assets?

Why aren’t we helping homeowners directly with their debt burden? Why aren’t we helping American families faced with bankruptcy. Why aren’t we reducing debt for Main Street instead of Wall Street? Isn’t it time for fundamental change in our debt based monetary system, so we can free ourselves from the manipulation of the Federal Reserve and the banks? Is this the United States Congress or the board of directors of Goldman Sachs? Wall Street is a place of bears and bulls. It is not smart to force taxpayers to dance with bears or to follow closely behind the bulls."
jeremy: Yeah, that’s a good speech, too!

Technorati Tags: american families, bailout, bankruptcy, bears, board of directors, bulls, debt burden, federal reserve, fundamental change, goldman sachs, manipulation, monetary system, new laws, premise, reducing debt, regulatory structures, speculation, taxpayers, united states congress, wall street

So how do we pay for them? The Treasury sell bonds to the Federal Reserve-debt monitization. That will lead to devalued dollars. That will result in a dozen eggs valued at , then , the 0 and so on.

Good luck to all, we will need it.

Technorati Tags: bonds, dozen eggs, federal reserve, good luck, treasury

Of course the Federal Reserve can print more money but eventually all that inflation will cause the dollar to become completely worthless. With all this out of control spending in Washington, is it possible America could go bankrupt?

Technorati Tags: federal reserve, inflation, money